The Free Trade Area of the Americas and MERCOSUR-European Union Free Trade Processes: Can They Learn Something from Each Other?

LACER-LACEA/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Devlin, Robert en
dc.contributor.editor INTAL en
dc.description.abstract The FTAA process itself has already generated important positive externalities for the hemisphere and the multilateral system. It has provided a regular forum in which 34 countries'; trade delegations have gotten to personally know each other better on a first name basis. This increasing personal espirit des corps not only has enhanced the FTAA process, but has also provided a new stage for resolving bilateral trade issues and undertaking new initiatives. Since the baseline for the FTAA is the WTO disciplines, FTAA meetings have been a learning laboratory for many delegations regarding the complex Uruguay Round obligations and other areas not yet contained therein (e.g., Competition Policy and mechanisms for communication with Civil Society). The Preparatory Stage also generated many comparative databases and inventories on trade-related issues among the 34, increasing intergovernmental transparency in trade relations. Moreover, thanks to the release of most of this information to the public, this transparency has been transmitted to private markets as well. Independently of whether an FTAA is actually realized in 2005, it has steady marched forward to date. The success raises the question about whether there are lessons for other ambitious transcontinental, or interregional, trade initiatives. More specifically, are there lessons for the just initiated MEU trade negotiations? Alternatively, are there possible lessons from the MEU approach for the FTAA process? The purpose of this paper is to preliminarily address these questions. There are serious limitations to doing so, however. First, the FTAA process is relatively advanced with more than 5 years of intense work behind it, yet it is still very incomplete and it remains to be seen whether the ultimate objective of a free trade area (FTA) is achieved. Meanwhile, the MEU negotiations have just begun in earnest. Hence, the evaluation of the former is based on an advanced process with incomplete outcomes, while the evaluation of the latter is based on only very initial steps of a process. The economic and political contexts of the two negotiation processes are quite different as well. en
dc.subject Globalization & Regionalization en
dc.title The Free Trade Area of the Americas and MERCOSUR-European Union Free Trade Processes: Can They Learn Something from Each Other? en
dc.contributor.other REG-FUSION-ADM
dc.coverage.spatial ALCA;MERCOSUR
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-11T18:03:31Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-11T18:03:31Z
dc.date.issued 2000-12-01
dc.identifier.isbn 950-738-101-5
dc.identifier.uri http://www.iadb.org/en/publications/publication-detail,7101.html?id=8637
dc.format.medium ACROBAT
dc.language.iso en
dc.subject Integración Hemisférica
dc.subject ALCA
dc.subject MERCOSUR
dc.subject INTAL ITD Occasional Paper N° 6
dc.subject INTAL
dc.subject Unión Europea
dc.type Technical Notes
lacea.language.supported en
dc.date.modified 2015-06-12T10:36:27Z
dc.description.abstract2 In December 1995 the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of MERCOSUR and the EU subscribed to an Interregional Framework Cooperation Agreement to strengthen relations between the two regions, including "encouraging the increase and diversification of trade, preparing for subsequent gradual and reciprocal liberalization of trade and promoting conditions which are conducive to the establishment of the Interregional Association, taking into account, in conformity with WTO rules, the sensitivity of certain goods". The initiative set the stage for a Joint Communiqué of Heads of State during the Latin American and Caribbean-EU Summit in Rio de Janeiro in June 1999 in which it was agreed to launch negotiations "aiming at bilateral, gradual, and reciprocal trade liberalization, without excluding any sector and in accordance with WTO rules" and that the interregional negotiations should "constitute a single undertaking¿". It also was decided that a first meeting of the Cooperation Council -first established by the above-mentioned Framework Agreement- would meet in November 1999 to discuss proposals regarding the structure, methodology, and calendar of negotiations. A first meeting of the Biregional Negotiations Committee took place in Buenos Aires in April 2000 to set up the organization, calendar and substance of the negotiations.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record



My Account